For decades, labor migration to Gulf Cooperation Council states has anchored Pakistan’s economy, channeling remittances to sustain millions amid chronic instability. The State Bank of Pakistan reported a record $38.3 billion in fiscal year 2025 remittances a 26.6 percent surge from the previous year’s $30.3 billion with Saudi Arabia ($823.2 million) and United Arab Emirates ($717.2 million) leading June 2025 inflows alone. This “human corridor” took shape during the 1970s oil boom, when Gulf Cooperation Council nations recruited skilled and unskilled workers from Punjab, the Northwest Frontier Province, and Karachi to build megaprojects like Riyadh’s metro and Dubai’s skyscrapers.
Managed through Pakistan’s Bureau of Emigration and Overseas Employment, the system has evolved into a structured pipeline dominated by Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar, alongside substantial irregular flows. Policymakers traditionally view this migration through an economic lens, and focus on labor rights and employment cycles, but emerging security assessments reveal a critical oversight. A security vector also permeates the Pakistan-Persian Gulf labor corridor.
This “human corridor” took shape during the 1970s oil boom, when Gulf Cooperation Council nations recruited skilled and unskilled workers.
Labor camps, with their isolated compounds and informal religious networks, serve as incubators for radicalization and transnational recruitment, blending sectarian influences with worker vulnerabilities. Returnees feed Pakistan’s militant ecosystems like Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan and Lashkar-e-Taiba, while onward migrants via Turkey-Balkans or Libya routes create blind spots in Europe’s counter-radicalization frameworks, exposing a stealth security vector no stakeholder fully monitors.
Labor camps that the Gulf countries create confine millions of South Asians in employer-dominated enclaves, where migrant workers live in densely populated compounds, follow rigid schedules, and form socially insular communities. After work, they typically rely on informal religious classes, community leaders, and expatriate clerics for social and emotional support. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates amplify Wahhabi-Salafi outreach among Pakistanis to counter Iranian influence, reshaping returnees’ views to align with Pakistan’s Deobandi and Ahl-e-Hadith strains. Studies highlight how debt bondage, isolation, and rights abuses in these zones prime vulnerabilities, with preachers filling social voids.
Saudi Arabia expelled approximately 40,000 Pakistan nationals between late 2016 to early 2017 due to alleged Islamic State connections, and complicity in terror planning, including a foiled bombing at the Jeddah Stadium, or simply representing a high-security risk; eighty-two individuals remained in the custody of intelligence agencies. Between 2012 and 2015, Gulf Cooperation Council states repatriated over 240,000 individuals to Pakistan, most of whom originated from districts with intense terrorist activity. Pakistan never conducted systematic debriefing of these individuals. Through mixing the ideologies of the Gulf with their unresolved grievances in Pakistan, the returnees have joined groups like Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan and Lashkar-e-Taiba.
Lashkar-e-Taiba exemplifies Gulf leverage: operatives recruit Indian or Pakistani Muslims, funnel funds and fighters from Omani hubs like Muscat to Kashmir and Afghanistan. Emirati arrests of Pakistanis for Lashkar-e-Taiba fundraising underscores labor status as militant cover.
Europe rarely figures in debates on Pakistan-Persian Gulf migration. It should. Many Pakistanis trying to immigrate to Europe are former employees in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates or Qatar. Instead of returning home, many choose to take the irregular immigration route into Europe. There are two main routes: the “Eastern Corridor,” which is from Pakistan, through Iran and eastern Turkey, then through the Balkans into Italy or Greece; and the “Central Mediterranean Corridor,” which requires Pakistanis to fly into Dubai or other major airport hubs and then onto Egypt or Libya, and then board a boat to southern Europe. Many recent studies suggest that the ongoing crackdown at the Turkey-Greece border has caused many Pakistanis to shift to the Libya route, resulting in large numbers of them perishing in the Mediterranean.
A number of Pakistani nationals who attempt crossings have spent years in labor camps that promote extreme interpretations of Islam.
For European security agencies, perhaps, there is less significance to how a person arrived in Europe than their ideological proclivities. A number of Pakistani nationals who attempt crossings have spent years in labor camps that promote extreme interpretations of Islam. Often, “Gulf-shaped outlooks” go undetected as part of risk assessments. After they arrive in Europe, they connect with other Pakistanis through community organizations and charitable groups, who then connect the migrants to clerics trained in the Gulf, thereby reproducing exegesis they learned abroad.
To address this growing problem, European states should require comprehensive residence histories in Schengen visa and asylum vetting, explicitly flagging extended Gulf labor stints. European security agencies should also integrate Gulf Cooperation Council deportation and arrest data into Europol’s counterterrorism platforms for early warnings.
Gulf states, too, should crack down by better regulating informal preaching networks in labor camps. They might publish anonymized annual statistics on ideology- or terrorism-related arrests of foreign workers, and coordinate tracking of high-risk deportees with origin countries.
If Pakistan is serious about countering radicalism before a terrorist incident precipitates a crackdown that will impact remittances, Islamabad should deploy specialized Labor-Mission Counter-Extremism Units within embassies in Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, and Doha for on-ground monitoring; mandate structured debriefing, psychosocial counseling, and risk profiling for returnees; and negotiate trilateral data-sharing pacts to bridge silos.
Radicalization does not spring from innate beliefs but from the brutal adversities of Gulf camps’ exploitation, isolation, debt, and despair that propel desperate workers toward extremists.
