Although Salman Rushdie disavowed elements in his book that question the Quran or challenge Islam and believed the threat against him had vaporized, the attack on him in Chautauqua, New York, proves he was never safe. |
The stabbing of Salman Rushdie sends a renewed message to the world: take Islamism – the transformation of the Islamic faith into a radical utopian ideology inspired by medieval goals – seriously.
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the most consequential Islamist of the past century, personally issued the edict (often called a fatwa) condemning Rushdie to death in 1989. Khomeini, responding to the title of Rushdie’s magical-realist novel The Satanic Verses, decided it blasphemed Islam and he deserved death. Initially alarmed by this edict, Rushdie spent over 11 years in hiding protected by the British police, furtively moving from one safe house to another under a pseudonym, his life totally disrupted.
Already during those years, however, Rushdie made several feints to convince himself that the edict was relaxing. In 1990, he disavowed elements in his book that question the Quran or challenge Islam; his opponents rightly dismissed this as deceit, but Rushdie insisted, ‘I feel a lot safer tonight than I felt yesterday.’
In 1998, after some mumbled concessions by Iranian officials, Rushdie triumphantly declared his troubles entirely over:
“There is no longer any threat from the Iranian regime. The fatwa will be left to wither on the vine. ... When you’re so used to getting ... bad news, then news like this is almost unbelievable. It’s like being told the cancer is gone. Well, the cancer’s gone.
So convinced was Rushdie that the threat had vaporised, he upbraided the organisers of the 11th Prague Writers’ Festival in 2001 for the security they arranged for him.
“To be here and find a relatively large security operation around me has actually felt a little embarrassing, because I thought it was really unnecessary and kind of excessive and was certainly not arranged on my request. I spent a great deal of time before I came here saying that I really didn’t want that. So I was very surprised to arrive here and discover a really quite substantial operation, because it felt like being in a time warp, that I had gone back in time several years.
In 2017, Rushdie both criticised the Quran (‘not a very enjoyable book’) and mocked the death edict on a comedy show, boasting of its compensations, notably what he called ‘fatwa sex’ with women attracted to danger.
Last year, he surprisingly acknowledged his own aversion to pessimism:
“It’s true, I am stupidly optimistic, and I think it did get me through those bad years, because I believed there would be a happy ending, when very few people did believe it.
As Rushdie and his friends thought the fatwa a thing of the past, his Islamist enemies unendingly reiterated that the death sentence remained in place, that they eventually would get him. And indeed they did.
As Rushdie and his friends thought the fatwa a thing of the past, his Islamist enemies unendingly reiterated that the death sentence remained in place, that they eventually would get him. And indeed they did; it took one third of a century but the attack finally came as Rushdie presented himself, unprotected, to the public.
Will the rest of us learn from this sad tale? Russia and China are certainly great power foes, but Islamism is an ideological threat. Its practitioners range from the rabid (ISIS) to the totalitarian (the Islamic Republic of Iran) to the mock-friendly (the Turkey of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan). They threaten via propaganda, subversion, and violence. They mobilise not just in the caves of Afghanistan but in idyllic resort towns like Chautauqua, New York.
May Salman Rushdie return to complete health and his suffering serve as a warning against wishful thinking.
Daniel Pipes is president of the Middle East Forum.