The streets of Detroit have long been a symbol of American resilience and industrial might. Yet, a recent event planned for the heart of the city reveals a disturbing new reality: the normalization of radical, anti-American ideology under the guise of activism. The Detroit People’s Conference for Palestine, themed “Gaza is the Compass,” is not merely a free speech event—it is a dangerous platform for Islamism, an ideology fundamentally at odds with Western values, and it is gaining an alarming foothold in places like Michigan.
The conference’s marquee speakers include Hussam Shaheen and Omar Assaf. The former, a Tanzim operative and leader of Fatah’s youth movement, was released from Israeli prison after being convicted of attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder. Shaheen’s criminal history, which includes establishing a terrorist cell and procuring firearms for a planned attack, is not a footnote; it is his resume. The organizers are not hiding this fact but celebrating it, inviting attendees to “hear directly about the prisoners’ struggle in Zionist prisons.” This narrative transforms a convicted terrorist into a celebrated martyr, and in doing so, it attempts to legitimize violence and hate.
Joining him is Omar Assaf, a founding official of the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP), a formerly designated terrorist organization. Assaf’s current role as coordinator of the Palestinian Popular Conference is even more chilling. A day after the brutal October 7th massacre, which saw the slaughter and kidnapping of innocent civilians, his organization praised the attackers and promised to “intensify engagement” to “destroy Israel.” This is not a call for peace or justice. It is a clarion call for violence, advocating for armed conflict and the destruction of a sovereign nation. These are not political grievances; they are the tenets of an extremist ideology that rejects diplomacy and embraces violence as a primary tool.
By inviting such individuals and celebrating their actions, the conference directly promotes an ideology that glorifies violence and seeks to dismantle Western-aligned democratic states. This is a direct importation of radicalism onto American soil.
The dangers of this are manifold. By inviting such individuals and celebrating their actions, the conference directly promotes an ideology that glorifies violence and seeks to dismantle Western-aligned democratic states. This is a direct importation of radicalism onto American soil. The danger is not that these speakers will orchestrate attacks on US soil—it is that they will indoctrinate a new generation with their poisonous ideas, normalizing hate and transforming political discourse into a justification for terror.
What makes this especially concerning is the involvement of prominent American figures. The presence of Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib and Richmond Mayor Eduardo Martinez lends a veneer of respectability to an event that is, at its core, a showcase for anti-American and anti-Western sentiment. Their participation provides a critical seal of approval, blurring the lines between legitimate political dissent and outright extremism. It allows figures with a history of violence and a stated goal of destroying a US ally to operate within the mainstream, recruiting and inspiring their followers in America.
The choice of Detroit and Michigan as the hub for this conference is no accident. The region is home to one of the largest and most politically active Muslim and Arab-American communities in the country. While the vast majority of these citizens are patriotic Americans, a small but radical minority seeks to weaponize the community’s political power for an extremist agenda. By hosting these figures, the conference organizers are not speaking for the community as a whole but attempting to hijack its voice and direct its influence toward a cause that is deeply antithetical to the principles of a free and open society.
The controversy has already prompted a response from Michigan lawmakers, who have called on the State Department to investigate and deny visas to speakers with ties to terrorist organizations. In turn, conference organizers have rejected these concerns as attempts to “smear and silence” their work, and have disclaimed responsibility for the views of their speakers. This disingenuous attempt to insulate the conference from accountability while knowingly providing a platform for extremists is a new low. It highlights a dangerous precedent: the creation of a space where violent rhetoric is not only permitted but celebrated, all while claiming the mantle of free speech.
Published originally on August 27, 2025.
