Why I Am Not a Populist

Originally published under the title "Blame the left for the Soviet Union, China and a ruined Europe."

Populism is little more than anti-elitist hot air.

Populism has made great strides in the West. But it is misguided, and I greatly hope it fails.

There’s no standard definition for populism but it always includes some degree of denigrating the rich and powerful while praising the virtuous and innocent common folk. Populists ascribe obscene self-serving motives to the greedy, privileged, and exploitative elite. Were only the country class to mobilize, they argue, it could expel the ruling class, replace it, and claim its righteous share.

Populism has left and right versions, led in the United States by Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. Leftists usually focus on money (Occupy Wall Street’s 1%, Sanders’ billionaires), while Rightists attack insider influence (the Tea Party’s Swamp, Steve Bannon’s Deep State). Very occasionally, they agree on a common enemy, such as Globalists.

Trump and Sanders are America’s leading populists, representing the right and left versions.

Populism need not rely on conspiracy theories, but it often does, as these neatly explain how so tiny a minority can enjoy such wealth and influence. Likewise, it need not turn to antisemitism, but the temptation permanently exists to single out Jews as rich, connected, or both.

I am not a populist. I do not blame the rich or bureaucrats for our problems; rather, I blame the Left.

For two and a half centuries, the Left has been a font of terrible ideas, socialism foremost but so many others too, including: the noble savage, emphasizing equality over freedom, progressivism, the administrative state, the personal is political, anthropogenic climate change, white guilt, marriage for all, and the “childfree” movement.

Some billionaires and senators, to be sure, espouse these bad ideas; but plenty do not. George Soros and Elizabeth Warren do, Sheldon Adelson and Ted Cruz do not. The problem is not someone having wealth or power but his point of view. So, it’s a mistake to go indiscriminately after the elite.

Soros and Adelson are two of America’s leading political donors.

Further, the elite has necessary roles: most rich earned their money by creating wealth and the government must rely on bureaucrats to function. Destroying it does irreparable damage; just look at Venezuela for an example and imagine what damage Jeremy Corbyn’s left-populism would do in the United Kingdom. (“Super-rich prepare to leave UK ‘within minutes’ if Labour wins election,” reads one headline.)

The Supreme Court also shows the limitations of populist rage. Almost by definition, nominees to the court come from erudite and elite circles. (G. Harrold Carswell settled that in 1970.) A justice’s privilege and brokerage account matter infinitely less than his good sense and his ability to express ideas.

I recently had some fun in a letter to the editor. It concerned an article I read by Christopher DeMuth in the Claremont Review of Books edited by Charles Kesler. In it, DeMuth introduces two ideal-types, Anywheres (“cosmopolitan, educated, mobile, and networked”) and Somewheres (“rooted in ... their families, neighborhoods, clubs, and religions”). It was all very convincing except that DeMuth the author, Kesler the editor, and I the reader are card-carrying Anywheres (all three of us have degrees from Harvard) who espouse Somewhere views. Again, stereotypes mislead.

Populism is a simple response to a complex problem.

Trump (Penn ’68, NBC, Forbes #275) rates as a partial populist. That’s why Bannon, frustrated by this partiality, quickly flamed out of his administration. Trump attacks the elite media and the intelligence agencies but not the rich (well, of course not, as he is one of them) nor Jews (though it’s easy to imagine his latent stereotypes bursting forth).

Populism is a simple response to a complex problem. Like racism, it incorrectly attributes one characteristic to a diverse population. Like racism, it is an ignorant, mischievous impulse that, based on a falsehood, satisfies base instincts. It cannot solve problems but only creates new ones.

Are you discontented with the direction of the United States? Then focus your attention on the real problem: the leftist elite – politicians, bureaucrats, journalists, intellectuals, teachers, artists, et al. The Left brought us the Soviet Union, Communist China, and calamities in Cuba, Cambodia, and Vietnam. Today, it is actively ruining Europe. Warren wants to impose a wealth tax, ban fracking, create a government monopoly on health care, and abolish the Electoral College.

So, be smart and oppose the Left, not the elite.

Daniel Pipes is president of the Middle East Forum.

Daniel Pipes, a historian, has led the Middle East Forum since its founding in 1994. He taught at Chicago, Harvard, Pepperdine, and the U.S. Naval War College. He served in five U.S. administrations, received two presidential appointments, and testified before many congressional committees. The author of 16 books on the Middle East, Islam, and other topics, Mr. Pipes writes a column for the Washington Times and the Spectator; his work has been translated into 39 languages. DanielPipes.org contains an archive of his writings and media appearances; he tweets at @DanielPipes. He received both his A.B. and Ph.D. from Harvard. The Washington Post deems him “perhaps the most prominent U.S. scholar on radical Islam.” Al-Qaeda invited Mr. Pipes to convert and Edward Said called him an “Orientalist.”
See more from this Author
A Weaker U.S. May Compel Allies to Increase Strength
October 7 Changed Everything in Israel, They Said. But Did It?
The Array of Threats Facing Israel Make It Unlike Any Other Contemporary State
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.