Iran Threatens Neighbors as Talk of a ‘Land Blockade’ Grows

Iran Appears Confident That It Can Survive and Is Conducting Aggressive Diplomacy to Fend off Attacks on Infrastructure

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is pictured in July 2025 at the BRICS plenary session in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is pictured in July 2025 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Shutterstock

During a July interview, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi explained that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps attacked neighboring countries to pressure the United States and deter attacks on Iranian infrastructure. With President Donald Trump again threatening attacks on Iran’s energy centers, Iran returns to the same tactic. On August 1, 2026, Ali Abdollahi, commander of the Khatam al-Anbiya base, warned, “With foresight, Muslim countries should observe America’s crimes and reconsider cooperation and partnership with America. Otherwise, any country that makes itself criminal and invasive America’s defense shield will burn in the war’s fire.”

“The Islamic Republic of Iran will use all of its tools for the natural right of legitimate defense.”

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs likewise issued a statement, accusing the United States of reneging on the Memorandum of Understanding. The statement mentioned that the three ships Iran attacked were transiting through an “unsafe and illegal” path in the Strait of Hormuz, though firing at ships does not imply concern for safety. The statement declared, “The Islamic Republic of Iran will use all of its tools for the natural right of legitimate defense.”

Araghchi called his Saudi and Turkish counterparts and the Pakistan Army Chief of Staff Asim Munir to warn that Iran will meet any American attacks with regional retaliation, but he saved his direct threats for the Saudis: “Any regional country’s cooperation or partnership [with the United States and Israel] will meet [Iran’s] capable armed forces’ definitive and proportionate answer.”

Iran is also publicizing Bahrain’s King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa’s plea, asking Iran, “Do not attack us for the sake of the Prophet.” Esmaeil Bagahei, Foreign Ministry spokesman, rebuked the plea. Reciting the Qur’anic verse, “And do not incline toward those who do wrong,” Baghaei questioned Hamad’s faith. “It is fitting to assess their own conduct [against Muhammad’s] before they advise others,” adding, “Is partnering with forces that are invading another Muslim country militarily not a clear violation of the Qur’an?” Baghaei also pointed to Bahrain’s hosting American military bases as another religious violation.

Iran’s threats go beyond the Middle East. Encouraged by the regime’s strategic victory, Araghchi also threatened his new British counterpart, David Miliband. According to Iranian outlets, Araghchi mentioned the previous administration’s designation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and told his counterpart to “reconsider” the United Kingdom’s approach. Araghchi also said that allowing the United States to use British territory would make the United Kingdom a legitimate target. Miliband responded that this is a new administration, and that the United Kingdom is not a part of the war.

Ebrahim Rezaei, a member of the parliament’s National Security Committee, tweeted, “Our response to any potential enemy attack will not be limited to the Persian Gulf region; we will respond to all enemy bases and to the origin of the attacks from anywhere.”

“Our response to any potential enemy attack will not be limited to the Persian Gulf region.”

Parliamentarian Ebrahim Rezaei

The Telegraph reported on July 31, 2026, that the United States and Israel discussed a “land blockade.” Iran boasts that its geography makes a total siege impossible. Locking Iran within its borders, if implemented, could be a challenge that Iran is unprepared to meet.

While Iranians have reposted that story, both Iran’s military and foreign ministry remain silent. Manuchehr Mottaki, Araghchi’s predecessor and an adviser to the supreme leader, albeit one without much influence, is the only official to comment, suggesting that a ground siege means exerting pressure on Iraq and Pakistan to close their borders to Iran. Fararu and Fars News have also provided commentary on the story, though without much sense of direction. The silence of key figures and the websites connected with the decision-makers could be a hint that Iran is taking the threat seriously and examining its options.

Meantime, Iran appears confident that it can survive an escalation. It is currently conducting an aggressive diplomatic offensive to fend off attacks on its key infrastructure. In his interview, Araghchi said that Iran did not go hard against the infrastructure of its neighbors because it hoped threats would be enough. If Iranian power and oil facilities are set on fire, however, Araghchi is likely not bluffing: Iran will seek to ensure that Arab states suffer the same fate.

Shay Khatiri is a researcher at CAMERA, a senior fellow at the Yorktown Institute, and a fellow at the Rainey Center.
See more from this Author
Regime Officials Threatened War in the Caspian Sea and Promised to Punish Ukraine and the United States
The Regime Media Continue to Portray the Current Phase of the War as Unprovoked, Omitting Iran’s Assaults on Shipping
Araghchi Claims That the War Occurred Because Tehran Refused Concessions That Would Limit Uranium Enrichment
See more on this Topic
If Criticism of Spain’s Position on Ceuta and Melilla Surprised Madrid, It Is Not Because Such Arguments Suddenly Emerged
Compensating Victims of Iranian Attacks Would Demonstrate Washington’s Commitment to Its Regional Partners
A More Robust U.S. Presence in Somaliland Is Necessary to Handle the Logistics of Resupply and Provide Air Defense