What does the President of Iran have in common with an Associate Professor at Lincoln University?
They both question the historical validity of the Holocaust.
The principal difference between Lincoln's Kaukab Siddique and Mahmoud Ahmandinejad is that Iran's President is paid by the Islamic government of Iran for his rantings but Siddeque is paid by the taxpayers of Pennsylvania, which owns Lincoln University.
For an academician to deny a historical fact is beyond the pale of free speech and is nothing but hateful anti-Semitic comment. In his own field, English and Literature, what Siddique said is tantamount to denying Shakespeare.
Siddique is a Pakistani Muslim who if Uncle Irvin had his way would be deported back to Pakistan.
In the interim, Siddique deserves to be censored and fired by the faculty and administration of Lincoln University including President Ivory Nelson.