[Brandon Mayfield Case:] “If You Are Muslim, You Are Suspect”

The U.S. government wrongly arrested Brandon Mayfield, 37, of Beaverton, Ore. on May 6. A fingerprint sent from Madrid apparently connected him to the March 11 bombings there that killed 191 people and injured 2,000. When the Spanish government identified the fingerprint as that of an Algerian, the Department of Justice requested that Mr. Mayfield be released, and he was on May 20.

Putting aside the technical mistake, the Justice Department has come under criticism for having built its case against Mr. Mayfield in part by noting his Islamic affiliations. “I am an American Muslim,” Mr. Mayfield declared on release; “I have been singled out and discriminated against, I feel, as a Muslim.” His father Bill concurred: “They picked him out because they wanted someone who fit this profile. This was the closest they had, and he was a Muslim.”

“If you are Muslim you are suspect,” commented Samer Horani of the Islamic Center of Portland. Dave Fidanque of the American Civil Liberties Union piled on: “as far as the Justice Department is concerned, if you’re Muslim and attend particular mosques that are suspect, you’re presumed guilty until you’re proved innocent.” The New York Times disapprovingly notes that the decision to detain Mr. Mayfield “was clearly influenced by his Muslim ties.”

But did U.S. law enforcement err in noting Mr. Mayfield ‘s identity?

No, this was entirely appropriate. It would have been myopic to ignore Mr. Mayfield ‘s many connections to militant Islam and the global jihad.

In addition:

  • Mr. Mayfield’s political profile fits that of many disaffected, America-hating terrorists: he strongly opposes the Patriot Act, inveighs against American foreign policy related to Muslim countries, and is “particularly angered,” according to his brother Kent, by close U.S. relations with Israel. Mr. Mayfield speculates that the Bush administration knew in advance about 9/11 but chose to let the attacks go ahead so as to justify going to war. And on his release from custody, he compared the U.S. federal government to Nazi Germany.
  • In common with many violence-prone Islamists in the United States (including Maher Hawash, Mohammed Ali Alayed, Zacarias Moussaoui, and the “Lackawanna Six”), Mr. Mayfield went from being a nominal Muslim to one whose Islamic beliefs “got more and more intense.”

Are government prosecutors, when they have apparently incriminating physical evidence, supposed to shut their eyes and disregard these many connections and patterns? The Justice Department was simply doing its job in pointing them out.

Even Ibrahim Hooper of the Council on American-Islamic Relations – an Islamist group with multiple connections of its own to violence – admits that “no Muslim is more than six degrees away from terrorism.” Governments worldwide must take this reality into account. ____________

Sep. 20, 2004 update: For more news on the evidence in this case, see “More Reasons for Brandon Mayfield’s Incarceration.”

____________

Daniel Pipes, a historian, has led the Middle East Forum since its founding in 1994 and currently serves as chairman on the board of directors. He taught at Chicago, Harvard, Pepperdine, and the U.S. Naval War College. He served in five U.S. administrations, received two presidential appointments, and testified before many congressional committees. The author of 16 books on the Middle East, Islam, and other topics, Mr. Pipes writes a column for the Washington Times and the Spectator; his work has been translated into 39 languages. DanielPipes.org contains an archive of his writings and media appearances; he tweets at @DanielPipes. He received both his A.B. and Ph.D. from Harvard. The Washington Post deems him “perhaps the most prominent U.S. scholar on radical Islam.” Al-Qaeda invited Mr. Pipes to convert and Edward Said called him an “Orientalist.”
See more from this Author
Turkey’s Erdoğan and Israel’s Netanyahu Have Both Defensive and Offensive Motives to Fight in Syria
Those Twelve Days Should Have Repercussions Long Into the Future
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.