San Francisco State’s Rabab Abdulhadi: Always the Victim

Please click here to sign a Change.org petition calling on San Francisco State University to end its 2014 memorandum of understanding (MOU) with An-Najah University, a Palestinian school that promotes radicalism and violence.

Originally published under the title “Anti-Israel San Francisco State Professor Is Always the Victim.”

Professor Rabab Abdulhadi says she’s “really insulted” when people accuse her of antisemitism.

“We are reminded of McCarthyism in the 1950s,” asserted San Francisco State University (SFSU) Professor of Race and Resistance Studies Rabab Abdulhadi at Washington, DC’s anti-Israel Jerusalem Fund conference.

Her clichéd and morally inverted presentation, “In Service of State Violence: Palestine and Restrictions on Academic Freedom,” before about 20 people, depicted the professor — a notorious Israel-hater — as a victim of nefarious right-wing forces.

Abdulhadi began her lecture with her customary politically-correct invocation: “We are meeting on indigenous stolen people’s lands.” She didn’t specify which Amerindian tribe owned the land, and why it would have greater claim over Washington, DC, than the city’s current diverse inhabitants. But she did establish the lecture’s leitmotiv: the mythical narrative of native Palestinians fighting against European Jewish colonialism.

Accordingly, Abdulhadi later declared: “It is really important to contest the colonial narrative” of Zionism in the Holy Land, and celebrate the “multiple stories that defy the story of submission, subjugation and defeat.” One of her slides displayed the violent slogan, “My heroes have always killed colonizers,” which was proudly exhibited at SFSU in 2013 by the radical General Union of Palestinian Students (GUPS) — with Abdulhadi as faculty advisor. That display was so blatant that SFSU President Les Wongno friend of Israel’s — condemned this as antisemitic incitement.

Abdulhadi fancies herself the victim of a “pro-Israel lobby network.”

Yet, Abdulhadi fancied herself the victim of a “pro-Israel lobby network, an industry,” which she said consisted of groups like the Lawfare Project and the “shadowy organization” Canary Mission; in reality, Canary Mission is an exposer of antisemites at American universities. “The right wing has done it many times; we can go into the history of interventions around the world,” she added, ludicrously comparing Zionists to US intelligence professionals.

Exhibiting profiles from leftist smear merchant the Southern Poverty Law Center, Abdulhadi falsely decried “leading Islamophobes” like David Horowitz and Middle East Forum (MEF) President Daniel Pipes.

Abdulhadi has denounced a petition by MEF/Campus Watch to end the Memorandum of Understanding she brokered between SFSU and An-Najah University in the West Bank.

As she disclosed earlier this year, Abdulhadi’s current opposition to Pipes stems largely from the MEF/Campus Watch campaign to end the Memorandum of Understanding she brokered between SFSU and the jihadist-dominated An-Najah University in the West Bank.

Meanwhile, Abdulhadi showed slides of the David Horowitz Freedom Center (DHFC) posters highlighting her radicalism, which were placed on SFSU’s campus, citing them as examples of her victimization. “What does it mean to experience Islamophobia, to experience anti-Arab discrimination, to experience anti-Palestinian racism that is organized, that is happening day in and day out,” she asked. Because of these posters, she alleged — and not for the first time — “myself [sic] and the students are actually very afraid to walk on campus ... this is part of the reason for it ... to actually make us unhappy and makes us shut up.”

Deceptively associating criticism with censorship, Abdulhadi whined that the “Israel lobby” seeks “to silence anybody who does scholarship, pedagogy, research or advocacy on justice in and for Palestine.” Smearing Israel as an apartheid state, she claimed that the “lobby” wants “to basically cover up and apologize for Israeli atrocities,” and “stop the tide of history ... because we know what happened in the 1980s with the anti-apartheid movement” against South Africa. “We are not going to allow advocacy, scholarship for teaching about Palestine to be criminalized,” she proclaimed, as if there’s a dearth of such “scholarship” in universities.

Abdulhadi’s cries of victimhood portray professors as powerless against pro-Israel voices.

In typically paranoid fashion, Abdulhadi placed this “Israel lobby” within a wider “very well-funded ... political agenda” with “all the power and the resources” to support a “most rightwing agenda” that is “anti-women” and “anti-union.” Spewing that “Zionism is racism,” she falsely correlated Israel with “white supremacy” by noting American white supremacist Richard Spencer’s declaration on Israeli television that “I am a white Zionist.” “He was advocating the same agenda for the US as Zionists were advocating for Israel,” she declared, omitting Israelis’ clear rejection of his ideology.

Dismissing accusations of anti-Semitic bigotry, Abdulhadi claimed that suppression occurs “under the pretext that criticizing Israel is anti-Semitism.” “One of the things I am actually really insulted about is to be accused of anti-Semitism,” she asserted unconvincingly. “My job as a professor is to make you comfortable in the classroom,” she maintained, although one doubts a pro-Israel student in one of her classes would agree.

Students affiliated with GUPS disrupt a talk by Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat at SFSU in 2016.

The ugly reality of Abdulhadi and her GUPS acolytes, who have contributed to SFSU’s reputation as one of the most radical universities in the country, is far different from her self-serving protestations. She displayed a Canary Mission tweet about the “Jerusalem Mayor Shout-Down” referring to the violent disruption of Nir Barkat‘s 2016 SFSU presentation by GUPS. Rather than condemning this obstruction of free speech — like Wong did — she regurgitated unsubstantiated charges against the “racist mayor of occupied Jerusalem.”

Abdulhadi’s through-the-looking-glass cries of victimhood portray professors as powerless against pro-Israel voices. Meanwhile, she has no compunction about celebrating terror against Israel. Her persecution-complex fantasies reveal that what professional propagandists in the field of Middle East studies fear the most is exposure.

Andrew Harrod (@AEHarrod) is a fellow at the Lawfare Project and at Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum.

Andrew E. Harrod
Andrew E. Harrod
Andrew E. Harrod is a freelance researcher and writer who holds a Ph.D. from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a J.D. from George Washington University Law School. He is admitted to the Virginia State Bar. Harrod’s work concerning various political and religious topics has appeared at the American Thinker, Breitbart, the Daily Caller, the Institute on Religion and Democracy, the Investigative Project on Terrorism, and World, among others. He is a fellow with the Lawfare Project, an organization combating the misuse of human rights law against Western societies.
See more from this Author
Not Even Jews Facing a Recent Organized Pogrom in Amsterdam Received His Complete Sympathy
Prof: Gaza’s Muslim Arabs, Not Israel’s Jews and Other Citizens, Are the Real Victims on the Defense Against Israeli Aggression
The Expressed Anti-american, Anti-Israel, and Antisemitic Sentiment Is Nothing New Among Middle East Studies Professors.
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.