Putin Destroys the Rules-Based International Order

Originally published under the title "Russia's Blitz to Wipe a Nation off the Map."

A graphic posted by the Ukrainian government’s official Twitter account on the first day of the Russian invasion.

06:00 Moscow time (UTC+3), on Thursday, February 24th, 2022, is likely to be remembered as one of those hinge moments on which history turns. At that hour, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a military operation with the goal of what he referred to as the “demilitarization and de-Nazification of Ukraine.” The Russian president described the action about to be undertaken as a long-overdue strike against an American-led world order that he characterized as an “empire of lies.”

The operation, which commenced shortly after the Russian leader’s statement, appears to be nothing less than an effort to reverse the course of events in Europe since the ending of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union. The implications for the international system, and for the sovereign rights of states and peoples, are grave.

Reports coming in from Ukraine indicate that the first phase of this operation, currently under way, is an effort to destroy Ukraine’s air defense infrastructure. The list of targets struck now extends to the far west of Ukraine, close to the border with Poland. The western Ukrainian cities of Ivano Frankivsk and Lutsk have received fire. Foreign embassies have now relocated in their entirety across the border to Poland.

Michael Kofman, a Russia analyst at the Center for a New American Security, tweeting on Thursday categorized the current targets as “air defense, command and control, logistics, air bases and air fields, but also large force concentrations.”

Russian ground forces, meanwhile, have now crossed in from Belarus, to Ukraine’s north, and from Crimea. Incursions have also taken place into the Luhansk, Sumy, Kharkiv, Chernihiv and Zhytomyr districts. There is a real possibility that the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, could soon find itself surrounded and then occupied by Russian forces.

There had been rumors of what was coming. A Ukrainian military analyst informed me and other colleagues on Monday that “with 90% certainty” a large scale invasion would begin on the 24th. The messages emerging from Western governments regarding the likely imminence of the invasion had been clear and unambiguous. But the speed and ferocity of what is now transpiring nevertheless caught Ukrainians and outside observers alike by surprise. Shock and awe is clearly the Russian intention. Putin wants to pulverize Ukraine’s capacity for conventional resistance in the shortest possible time.

But to what larger purpose? The extreme and even bizarre terms used by the Russian president – “demilitarization” and “denazification,” no less, of a country with a Jewish president many of whose family members perished in the Holocaust – confirm the far reaching dimensions and objectives of what is taking place.

“They want to destroy the state of Ukraine. Putin wants to crush it, so that it no longer exists,” is the unambiguous verdict of Mykola, a 35 year old Kiev based journalist, regarding Moscow’s goals. Mykola is an old friend and colleague of mine from the days when we covered the protests at the Maidan Nezalezhnosti together, in 2014. He spoke to me this morning from his apartment in the city.

“I expect that they will create some quasi state on the east bank of the Dniepr. They wont go into the West,” he continued. “Putin doesn’t see that as part of Russia.”

As for the mood in the city, “people are calm. Many already left, but people are generally calm...our cafeteria’s still open, by the way.” The “cafeteria” is a favorite bar of ours close to the Arsenalna metro station. I had planned to meet Mykola there next week. With Kyiv’s Boryspil Airport under missile attack, these plans will have to be postponed, for a while. Maybe a long while.

Mykola and other Kievans I spoke to who preferred not to be named noted that they expect the Russians to seek to avoid widespread damage to the infrastructure of the city, if they can. This, after all, is an invasion, in the Russian telling, of a brother-people, intended to bring them back into the fold.

The focus, instead, will be to hit at key strategic points, crippling Ukraine’s military capacities and rendering organized, state level resistance impossible. It remains to be seen if this will be rapidly achieved.

Given the relatively recent vintage of Ukraine’s independence, Putin may have expected its rapid acquiescence.

The levels of resistance that will then emerge from the Ukrainian civilian populace also remain currently unknown. Putin may well have considered that the relatively recent vintage of Ukrainian independence, and the Russian speaking traditions of many central and eastern Ukrainians, might ensure rapid acquiescence, once the initial blitzkrieg phase of the operation currently under way is concluded.

He will also have noted that central and eastern Ukraine, which largely consist of flatlands under cultivation outside of the large cities, are hardly ideal terrain for guerrilla warfare.

The eclipse of Ukraine’s conventional forces is a foregone conclusion.

In this expected quiescence, however, the Russian leader may have mis-calculated, leaving his forces or their local puppets vulnerable to an insurgency that may follow the conclusion of conventional operations. The eclipse of Ukraine’s conventional forces, however, bereft of allies and support, is a foregone conclusion.

It is worth stating clearly what is currently under way in Ukraine, in order that the severity of the moment be fully understood. Vladimir Putin is currently in the process of seeking to wipe an internationally recognized sovereign state off the map. The Russian leader intends to reduce Ukraine once more to the vassal status from which it declared independence in 1991. No such effort has been undertaken in Europe since the darkest days of the 1940s. Further afield, one would need to recall Saddam Hussein’s abortive effort to wipe Kuwait out of existence in 1990 to find a parallel.

In that instance, in those distant days just after the end of the Cold War, a US led coalition firmly re-established the sovereign borders of the attacked country.

Putin has just driven a stake through the heart of the “rules based international order.”

No such coalition will be coming to the rescue of Ukraine. It is likely, however, that the missiles now landing on cities all over Ukraine are the opening salvos of a new competition that will dominate global affairs in the period to come. Vladimir Putin has just driven a stake through the heart of what remained of the “rules based international order.” There was always much less to that order than its adherents claimed. Now its obituary can be written.

With the Russian invasion of Ukraine, a new period of power politics and great power competition opens up. Putin has demonstrated that it will be a time of ruthless aggression.

The question remaining is whether it will also be characterized by a determined resistance to that aggression.

Jonathan Spyer is a Ginsburg/Milstein Writing Fellow at the Middle East Forum and director of the Middle East Center for Reporting and Analysis.

Jonathan Spyer oversees the Forum’s content and is editor of the Middle East Quarterly. Mr. Spyer, a journalist, reports for Janes Intelligence Review, writes a column for the Jerusalem Post, and is a contributor to the Wall Street Journal and The Australian. He frequently reports from Syria and Iraq. He has a B.A. from the London School of Economics, an M.A. from the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, and a Ph.D. from the London School of Economics. He is the author of two books: The Transforming Fire: The Rise of the Israel-Islamist Conflict (2010) and Days of the Fall: A Reporter’s Journey in the Syria and Iraq Wars (2017).
See more from this Author
Iran’s mobilisation of assets in support of Hamas in Gaza has now, through a ladder of escalation, brought the region within visible distance of war between Israel and Iran.
Fawzia Sido’s Decadelong Captivity Illustrates the Connections Between ISIS, Hamas and Other Jihadists
Israel Must Now Signal to Iran That Such Aggression Will Be Met with a Determined, Escalatory Response
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.