Israel Should Become the Guardian of Middle Eastern Christians

Why Minority Protection Must Become a Pillar of Israel’s Regional Strategy

As ancient Christian communities disappear across the Middle East, Israel is uniquely positioned to defend vulnerable minorities, preserve Judeo-Christian heritage, and counter the ideological monoculture imposed by political Islam—turning moral responsibility into strategic advantage.

Shutterstock

The ancient monasteries of Mosul are rubble. Bethlehem’s Christian population has collapsed from 86% in 1950 to barely 10% today. Across the Middle East, Christian communities that predate Islam by six centuries are shrinking or living under constant threat. Some have disappeared.

The world does nothing. The United Nations issues statements. The European Union expresses concern. Washington offers sympathy, occasionally backed by force, but rarely by sustained strategy. The architecture of international protection has failed.

One Middle Eastern power possesses the capability, the interest, and the moral authority to help fill this void. That power is Israel.

This is strategy, not charity. Israel should institutionalize it.

The collapse of the Middle Eastern order has altered Israel’s position. Israel is no longer merely a besieged state fighting for survival; it is a decisive regional actor with unmatched intelligence, military reach, and alliance potential. Yet the struggle is far from over. Iran’s network of proxies remains active and rebuilding. Hezbollah endures. Hamas adapts. Turkey advances its Islamist agenda. Political Islam continues to threaten regional minorities.

That reality makes minority protection not a postwar luxury, but a strategic necessity.

One Middle Eastern power possesses the capability, the interest, and the moral authority to help fill this void. That power is Israel.

A durable regional order — Pax Israeliana — cannot rest on military strength alone. It must also be built on alliances, economic integration, and the defense of vulnerable communities whose survival directly undermines the totalitarian vision of Islamist movements. Minority protection is not a moral add-on; it is a pillar of regional stability.

Christians, Druze, Kurds, and Yazidis of the Middle East are Israel’s natural partners. They face many of the same forces that have targeted the Jewish state for decades: jihadist movements, sectarian militias, and regimes that weaponize religious identity. When Druze villages in southern Syria faced imminent ISIS attack, Israeli intervention, not international peacekeepers, made the difference. When Christian communities sought protection or medical aid during the Syrian civil war, it was often Israel that quietly provided it.

These actions remain ad hoc and reactive. They reflect instinct rather than doctrine. That must change.

Israel should establish a dedicated governmental body with an explicit mandate to protect threatened minorities and preserve Judeo-Christian heritage across the Middle East. Modeled on Nativ, the organization that maintained ties with Soviet Jewry for decades, this agency could be housed in the Prime Minister’s Office and staffed by diplomats, intelligence professionals, humanitarian specialists, and heritage preservation experts. Call it Lishkat HaBrit: the Bureau of the Covenant.

Its mission would be fourfold: sustained diplomatic advocacy for persecuted communities; intelligence coordination to provide early warning of threats; targeted humanitarian assistance to besieged populations; and the preservation of churches, monasteries, and sacred sites representing two millennia of Christian presence in the region.

Israel should establish a dedicated governmental body with an explicit mandate to protect threatened minorities and preserve Judeo-Christian heritage across the Middle East.

This initiative aligns with what the Trump administration wants from its allies. Vice President JD Vance stated plainly: “We want the Israelis and the Sunnis to police their own region of the world.” He explained why America cares about this region at all, because most Americans believe their Savior “was born, died, and resurrected in that narrow little strip of territory on the Mediterranean.”

President Trump ordered strikes against ISIS in Nigeria on Christmas Day to protect Christians being slaughtered there. The message could not be clearer: this administration will act to defend persecuted Christians. But American reach has limits. American attention is divided. American troops cannot be everywhere. Israel can be the force multiplier that extends American values without requiring American boots on the ground.

Critics will object. They will label this neo-colonialism, as though protecting minorities from annihilation were equivalent to imposing foreign rule. They will warn of provoking Islamist hostility, as if the forces persecuting Christians and Yazidis were not already committed to Israel’s destruction. They will argue Israel should focus exclusively on Jewish interests, ignoring how minority alliances strengthen Israel’s regional position and reinforce its most important partnerships.

These objections are not serious. They represent the reflexes of a diplomatic establishment that has presided over the steady erosion of Middle Eastern pluralism.

Every Christian community that survives rebukes the ideological monoculture sought by political Islam. Every protected minority becomes a potential partner in intelligence, stability, and legitimacy. Every preserved church or monastery signals that alliance with Israel yields tangible benefits, and that the forces of destruction do not always prevail.

For 70 years, Israel asked the world for protection and received little more than statements. Today, Israel has the capacity to protect others who share its civilizational heritage and face its common enemies.

David Ben-Gurion created Nativ to uphold a covenant with Jews trapped behind the Iron Curtain. That mission succeeded beyond expectation. A new mission now presents itself: extend that covenant outward, strengthen the regional alliance against political Islam, preserve the living pluralism of the Middle East.

The age of isolation is over. The age of responsibility has arrived. Israel should rise to meet it.

Published originally on January 3, 2026.

Gregg Roman is the executive director of the Middle East Forum, previously directing the Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh. In 2014, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency named him one of the “ten most inspiring global Jewish leaders,” and he previously served as the political advisor to the deputy foreign minister of Israel and worked for the Israeli Ministry of Defense. A frequent speaker on Middle East affairs, Mr. Roman appears on international news channels such as Fox News, i24NEWS, Al-Jazeera, BBC World News, and Israel’s Channels 12 and 13. He studied national security and political communications at American University and the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, and has contributed to The Hill, Newsweek, the Los Angeles Times, the Miami Herald, and the Jerusalem Post.
See more from this Author
Domestic Repression in Iran Is Making an Already Dangerous Regime More Volatile
An Open-Source Assessment of U.S. Force Movements, Operational Readiness, and Risks of Escalation
A Comprehensive Assessment of the Iranian Opposition and Pathways to Democratic Transition
See more on this Topic
Domestic Repression in Iran Is Making an Already Dangerous Regime More Volatile
From Yemen to Sudan, Riyadh’s Willingness to Align With Islamists and Extremists Sets It Apart From Abu Dhabi
As Washington Accelerates Phase Two in Gaza, Jerusalem Risks Losing Control Over the Endgame