Iran’s Domestic Fragility Contrasts with Ability to Disrupt Global Markets

Tehran’s Rapid Retaliation Suggests That the Regime’s Decision-Making Structures Remain Functional

An MH-60S Sea Hawk helicopter, attached to Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 14, lands on the flight deck of Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) in support of Operation Epic Fury, March. 4, 2026. (U.S. Navy photo)

An MH-60S Sea Hawk helicopter, attached to Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 14, lands on the flight deck of Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) in support of Operation Epic Fury, March. 4, 2026. (U.S. Navy photo)

U.S. Central Command Public Affairs

Iran continued targeting energy infrastructure across the Middle East on March 19, 2026, as global markets turned volatile amid surging energy prices driven by the escalating conflict. Oil rose to around $113–$115 per barrel.
Equity markets fell worldwide. U.S. stocks dropped sharply, with the Dow losing hundreds of points and futures remaining under pressure, while Asian and European markets also declined as higher energy costs fueled inflation concerns.

The economic shock is not limited to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz to most commercial shipping. Iran carried out sustained attacks on energy facilities in Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait over March 18–19. The latest incident involved a reported Iranian missile launch targeting Saudi oil terminals on the Red Sea, which Saudi and allied defense intercepted. These attacks intensified after Israeli strikes hit Iran’s South Pars gas facilities on March 18.

Iran carried out sustained attacks on energy facilities in Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait over March 18–19.

Despite the targeted killing of senior Iranian figures in recent days, command and control over strategic assets appears intact. Tehran’s rapid retaliation suggests that decision-making structures remain functional. Israeli officials have indicated that Iran’s leadership may be nearing a loss of control in some areas, Yet, while internal authority may be eroding, Iran’s ability to project force and unsettle global markets is evident.

It remains unclear whether the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is adapting its responses in real time or following preplanned escalation scenarios. Tehran long had warned it would ignite a regional conflict if attacked. The strikes on neighboring Arab states may reflect a preexisting strategy, with defined targets and escalation phases.

Revolutionary Guard-linked media outlets are amplifying this approach, providing near real-time coverage of attacks and highlighting their impact on global energy markets, particularly rising gas prices in Europe. At the same time, they emphasize opposition voices in the United States and Israel, promoting the narrative that economic disruption and political pressure in the West could force an end to the war and preserve the Islamic Republic.

Such an outcome, however, would leave both Iranians and regional states confronting a government that has tested multiple limits and may be more willing to use its leverage over maritime routes and energy flows in the future.

Israel’s campaign to decapitate Iranian leadership has disrupted command structures and contributed to disorder, though the government has prevented widespread unrest. Iranian opponents of the government are effectively betting on that same trajectory—seeking sufficient weakening to enable mass mobilization against the system.

Iranians will mark Nowruz, the Persian New Year, on March 20. There is less chance of large protests during the next week.

Social media posts by anti-government activists describe growing disorder and declining morale among security forces, driven by fear of Israeli drone strikes. They report erratic behavior, instances of unusual leniency toward civilians, and even indications that some personnel might side with protesters in the event of an uprising. These accounts also point to internal tensions, economic pressure, and reluctance among some commanders to continue operations, along with signs of disarray in Tehran.

What emerges is a gap between the government’s internal stability and its capacity to project military power externally. While weakening domestically and facing the risk of unrest, it still retains the ability to launch enough missiles and drones to disrupt global markets and restrict maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz.

Iranians will mark Nowruz, the Persian New Year, on March 20. There is less chance of large protests during the next week, as Israelis will continue targeting and degrading repressive forces throughout the country. People will spend the holiday quietly with family and friends, but many hope that Israel has further surprises in the coming weeks to enable Iranians to challenge the regime.

Mardo Soghom was a journalist and editorial manager at Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty for three decades, overseeing the Iran and Afghanistan services until 2020, and was chief editor of the Iran International English website.
See more from this Author
Washington Has Built up a Crisis-Response Network Capable of Amphibious Operations, Rapid Air Assault, and Swift Reinforcement
Tehran’s Rhetoric and Actions Point to a Regime That Sees Escalation as Leverage to Be Exploited
Many Countries May Try to Negotiate Arrangements with Tehran, to Avoid an Open-Ended Military Effort to Secure the Waterway
See more on this Topic
Washington Has Built up a Crisis-Response Network Capable of Amphibious Operations, Rapid Air Assault, and Swift Reinforcement
Strengthening Iraqi Kurdistan’s Defenses Would Help Alleviate Pressure on U.S. Personnel in the Region
Co-Production and Technology Transfer Are Central to the Relationship, and Israel Is Now Among India’s Leading Defense Partners