Frustrated by governments bending over backwards to accommodate Islam in the public square? Some Muslims are fed up with them as well, and a group in the UK has recently stepped forward to speak out on behalf of this “silent majority":
The government’s attempts to placate Muslims will cause long-term damage to communities, a charity said yesterday.
The warning came from Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, chair and co-founder of the British Muslims for Secular Democracy, a new organization claiming to represent the “silent majority who feel no conflict between their faith and democracy.”
Speaking before the launch, attended by Baroness Kishwer Faulkner and former Islamist Ed Husain, the journalist said the government was pandering to Muslims by granting too many concessions, fuelling their separation from the rest of society.
“The government has found a way of placating Muslims in a way that will only damage us in the long term, Muslims wanting separate schools or different measures. There must be one law for all.
“This differential accommodation leads to us being pushed to the edges. How is it that the Sikhs and Hindus can live in democracy but not Muslims?”
It is too early to tell whether BMSD will be the real deal, but there are reasons for optimism. Alibhai-Brown’s comments echoed her group’s censure of Archbishop Rowan Williams for suggesting that some aspects of Shari’a law should be accepted in the UK; a February press release called his position a “denial of the principles of gender equality and inclusion and shared citizenship” — a bold and welcome statement.
As Daniel Pipes frequently contends, “Radical Islam is the problem, moderate Islam is the solution.” Moderate Muslims who work to integrate their community into the broader social framework are thus indispensable for neutralizing Islamism at its source.
How will we know that they have succeeded? When objections to pandering are no longer rare enough to make the news pages.
