Federal Judge Dismisses ‘Anti-Islamophobia Initiative’ Lawsuit after Settlement Reached

Following a nearly two-year legal battle over the San Diego Unified School District’s “Anti-Islamophobia Initiative,” U.S. District Court Judge Cynthia A. Bashant issued an order dismissing the case with prejudice after the parties reached a settlement agreement.

The federal civil rights lawsuit, initiated on behalf of five families with children in the District and two local advocacy groups, was filed by the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund (FCDF) in May 2017 after the District’s Board of Education adopted a plan to “address the bullying and harassment of Muslim students and their families.” The plaintiffs claimed that the Initiative was religiously preferential and therefore violated the Constitution.

The settlement agreement requires the District to issue a policy memo to area superintendents and principals regarding the First Amendment’s “limits on the conduct of public school officials as it relates to religious activity.” It also directs educators to prohibit outside organizations from attempting to proselytize or influence children. The plaintiffs had contended that the District’s collaboration with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) to design the Initiative constituted government entanglement with religion. The case is Citizens for Quality Education San Diego, et al. v. Richard Barrera, et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-1054, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.