Re: Professor’s dismissal denounced,
July 30
I’m writing about the controversy over Carleton University’s decision to suspend Hassan Diab from teaching a course this summer.
Throughout my legal career, I’ve been heavily involved in human rights and labour issues. Because of the nature of the allegations against Diab, I took several days off work to attend his initial bail hearing in order to get a better understanding of what was actually involved.
While it’s true that the presumption of innocence is a long-established pillar of Canadian criminal law, it’s also a common labour law practice for those accused of substantial wrongdoing to be relieved of their duties pending resolution of their cases.
It would be shocking if this wasn’t the case for someone accused of multiple murders at a place of worship like Diab is.
In relieving Diab of his teaching duties while his case is ongoing, I believe Carleton University has now done the right thing.
Richard Warman, Ottawa
As an alumnus of Carleton University, and as a human being, I am deeply concerned by the recent dismissal of professor Hassan Diab.
This article said that he is alleged to have been involved in a terrorist act. Unless people are no longer innocent until proven guilty, how can an alleged act cause concern about his teaching position?
The worst that could happen in this case is that his views would be debated, in public, at an institution of higher learning. What could be more appropriate?
According to the Star, teaching is permitted under the terms of his bail. Why Carleton feels the need to substitute its judgment for the due process of law, I fail to understand.
If allegations are all that are required to have people removed from their jobs, then we are all in grave danger. I urge my alma matter to reconsider its actions.
Julian Egelstaff, Toronto