Gov. Jay Nixon on Monday vetoed an anti-"Sharia Law” bill, saying that in its zeal to address an imaginary problem, the legislation creates a real one for parents seeking foreign adoptions.
The bill would make it illegal for Missouri to enforce any foreign law or legal decision deemed “repugnant or inconsistent” with Missouri or U.S. law. It doesn’t specify Islamist Sharia religious law, but it’s part of a movement by conservative lawmakers in more than 20 states who have pushed similar measures to highlight alleged Sharia influences in the U.S.
“There are certainly problems facing our state and nation, but this isn’t one of them,” said Nixon, speaking to families at Lutheran Family and Children’s Services, a major adoption proponent.
The bill, he said, could muck up the works for families attempting to adopt through foreign governments: “The laws passed in Jefferson City have real consequences. This bill could jeopardize a family’s ability to adopt children from other countries.”
The bill was sponsored by Sen. Brian Nieves, R-Washington. His office didn’t return messages seeking comment Monday.
At a committee hearing on the bill in March, Nieves acknowledged that Missouri isn’t in immediate danger of being overtaken by foreign legal theories, saying, “Missouri’s been pretty fortunate as far as this goes.” But he said he wants to make sure the state “keeps things the way they are.”
Nixon’s written veto message says the bill “seeks to introduce a solution to a problem that does not exist and, in so doing, puts in jeopardy some of the very liberties that the bill purports to protect.”
The statement further warns that the bill, if signed into law, could create “a chilling effect” on international adoptions by Missouri families, and “could invite retaliatory action by a foreign country by denying all adoptions to Missourians.”
Nixon’s office cited data showing that, between 1999 and 2011, Missourians adopted more than 5,850 children born outside the U.S.
The veto message also warns of other potential problems that could be caused by the bill beyond the issue of foreign adoptions.
"(It) would needlessly cast doubt upon important legal instruments including wills, trusts, marriage and divorce decrees and contracts that involve foreign law,” says the message. “Our citizens and businesses should not be exposed to this unnecessary change and its unpredictable results.”
The original bill passed the Senate 24-9, which is one vote more than needed for a veto override. It passed the House 109-41, which is the exact number of “yes” votes needed.
(The bill is SB267.)