It is a recurring and increasingly ridiculous feature of jihad terror coverage: every time a Muslim screaming "Allahu akbar" plants a bomb or opens fire on a crowd of infidels, mainstream media coverage notes that "the attacker's motive is not known." But now Ayoub el-Khazzani, the Muslim gunman who was overpowered by three Americans, including two Marines, on a Paris-bound train last Friday, has gone the media one better by professing to be "dumbfounded" at being accused of terrorism. But the media, not unexpectedly, is happily going along, spreading the fog of disinformation that envelops the West's response to the jihad threat even more thickly.
El-Khazzani is "dumbfounded" that he is being accused of being a terrorist? Any sane person should be dumbfounded that he is dumbfounded. A bearded, caftan-wearing Muslim carries a Kalashnikov, an automatic pistol, ammunition and a box cutter onto a crowded train in a country where the Islamic State has repeatedly called for lone wolf jihad attacks, opened fire with the Kalashnikov, and he is "dumbfounded" that anyone thinks he is a terrorist? How stupid does he think Western authorities are?