Waging Peace: Lebanon and Syria: Geopolitical Dynamics [incl. Bassam Haddad]

THE NATIONAL Council on U.S.-Arab Relations conference included an Oct. 30 session on the geopolitical dynamics of Lebanon and Syria. Panelist Daoud Khairallah, adjunct professor of international law at Georgetown University Law Center, stated, “In Lebanon at this time Hezbollah and radical Sunni militants are the two groups that preoccupy most Lebanese” as well as international powers.

Critics of Hezbollah believe the group has become a state within a state, but according to Khairallah, Hezbollah in reality is a state in the absence of the state. “It is a byproduct of a dysfunctional sectarian system that prevents a level of solidarity necessary to establish a properly functioning state,” he explained. Hezbollah came into existence as a response to the Israeli invasion in 1982, he reminded his audience, while Lebanon was still in the throes of its civil war.

Most Lebanese, however, are far more concerned by the radical Sunni militants, Khairallah said. Some see the militants as a counterweight to Hezbollah, but Khairallah said that a small number of these militants, who are inspired by al-Qaeda, are stirring up most of the unrest in the country.

He warned that Israel and the U.S., who are supporting these Sunni militants, may soon discover that although today these radicals are opposing an influential Shi’i Hezbollah, they have no love for Israel and America’s actions in the Middle East. The situation could easily change, Khairallah noted, and not to the U.S. or Israel’s liking.

In the end, he concluded, Lebanon is the right environment for true and organic democracy to flourish, which is what Washington has been promoting for the region. “If secular democracy has any chance of succeeding this is where it should start,” he said. “This is where the internal and international efforts of secular democratic forces should be invested to stem the tide of fundamentalism.”

Syrian Ambassador Dr. Imad Moustapha said he and his country have accepted that they will not be able to have any dialogue with the United States while the current administration is in office. This is true despite the fact that the ambassador has conducted extensive outreach with both Republican and Democratic congressmen and senators. “It does not serve the national interest of Syria or the national interest of the United States to portray us as enemies,” he pointed out—this despite the fact that Damascus is playing a very active role in trying to resolve many conflicts in the region. And also despite the fact that Bush administration officials, including Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, have been meeting with the Syrian ambassador.

A week earlier, on Oct. 26, four U.S. helicopters entered Syria from Iraq and fired on a village near Abu Kamal, killing eight people, all unarmed Syrian civilians, the ambassador said. To add insult to injury, U.S. soldiers exited the helicopters and fired more bullets into the bodies to make sure they were dead. “It was a criminal terrorist attack against unarmed innocent civilians,” Ambassador Moustapha charged. “One father and four of his sons died. Another couple died. And an eighth man, a fisherman died. Totally, totally, unjustified.”

The Syrian diplomat speculated that the whole Rambo-style affair may have been some sort of October surprise undertaken to stir the emotions and minds of the American people before the November presidential elections. “Well, thank you very much,” he said, “but don’t come and kill Syrian innocent civilians in order to manipulate the domestic elections here in the United States.”

Finally Dr. Bassam Haddad, director of the Middle East Studies Program at George Mason University, took the podium. When it comes to Lebanon and Syria, and indeed the rest of the Middle East, he stated, the U.S. is inconsistent in its policymaking: “We want democracy, but we don’t like the winners,” Haddad pointed out. “We want pluralism, but we don’t want everyone represented. We want stability without balance of power.”

Haddad offered a few suggestions to American policymakers, including that they not take their own classification of what a terrorist is too seriously, because the rest of the world doesn’t. Secondly, there can be no true balance of power in the region without the support of Syria and Iran. Thirdly, he advised, don’t meddle in the internal affairs of these two countries—the alternative may be far worse than the current situation. Additionally, don’t think that the Syrians will be interested in a peace track that doesn’t include a comprehensive peace plan for the Palestinians. This is not just because the Syrians want to see justice for the Palestinians; it is simply in their overall interest. And finally, Haddad said, the U.S. must stop taking the advice of think tanks and Arab intellectuals who say they know the ultimate workings of the Arab mind and society. “You are being taken on an expensive and costly, often irreversible, ride,” he concluded.

A full transcript of the panel is available at
<http://ncusar.org/programs/08-transcripts/1030-LEBANON-AND-SYRIA.pdf>.

See more on this Topic
George Washington University’s Failure to Remove MESA from Its Middle East Studies Program Shows a Continued Tolerance for the Promotion of Terrorism
One Columbia Professor Touted in a Federal Grant Application Gave a Talk Called ‘On Zionism and Jewish Supremacy’