[JW title: “UCLA Prof Khaled Abou El Fadl Condemns ISIS, But Does He Condemn Stealth Jihad?”]
Khaled Abou El Fadl |
Given the apologias for the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria’s (ISIS) barbarism from the ranks of Middle East studies, it was encouraging to find the University of California, Los Angeles hosting the recent lecture, “ISIS’s Enslavement and Trafficking of Women.” The speaker, Khaled Abou El Fadl, Omar and Azmeralda Alfi Distinguished Professor of Law at UCLA, has a history of equivocating on Sharia (Islamic law) and other aspects of Islamism. Yet, in this instance, he provided insight into the regional, cultural, and ideological influences underlying ISIS’s crimes, albeit in a rambling, disorganized manner. A room reserved for 150 people at UCLA Law School swallowed the thirty who attended, a mix of students, parents, and faculty members. Perhaps embarrassed at the low turnout, Abou El Fadl stated at the outset: “There are tons and tons of people who believe they know and speak as if they know” about Islam, “but have very little interest in actually learning anything.” He further assured the audience that, “numbers do not reflect quality, so I will believe as a matter of conviction that you are worth a thousand because you are special people.”
These “special people” soon discovered just how elusive was the subject of Abou El Fadl’s lecture, for he spent the entire first half discussing human trafficking, only occasionally referencing ISIS. After explaining that, “It’s not very effective to take an issue out of the totality of its context,” he promised to eventually “get to the Muslim context of these things.”
Shifting from human trafficking to the “legitimizing culture” in Gulf countries and among “wealthy families and the ruling elites around the region” of virtual slavery (domestic workers), bride shopping, and the sex trade, Abou El Fadl explained the connection:
ISIS doesn’t invent the idea out of thin air. One of the videos in which ISIS is auctioning off women after a battle . . . the ones who are enthusiastically bidding on the product are clearly from the Gulf region.
If the jurists [Muslim scholars trained in Islamic law] tell ISIS enslaving people is wrong, the response will be, “You’re hypocrites, you engage in it all the time.” . . . ISIS is a very particular and specific animal that is symptomatic of much larger ideological movements that are problematic in their core.
At this promising juncture, Abou El Fadl began a tedious and minutiae-ridden analysis of the ideological relationship between ISIS and its forbearer, al-Qaeda, causing the audience to become impatient. Conceding as much, he stated, “We can talk until tomorrow and I’m sure you don’t want to stay until tomorrow.” Minutes later, after an audience member departed, he acknowledged:
Once people start sneaking out, it’s a sign that everyone is getting bored. I could lose myself in this stuff forever. I promise you I’ll try to contain myself.
There were exceptions to Abou El Fadl’s forthrightness. After invoking two books that “have become critical for ISIS and al-Qaeda,” Managing Barbarity by Abu Bakr Naji and Abu Mus’ab al-Suri’s The Global Islamic Resistance Call, he remarked that the latter reminded him of:
Islamophobic books that compile what they describe as every grievance committed by Muslims against Christians or against Jews, whether historical or not historical. Al-Suri does the exact same thing, but from the Muslim side.
Appearing flustered after further questioning, he betrayed his true feelings:
I see this a lot among young, American, enthusiastic Zionist activists. . . . It’s time for American Jews to confront the fact that Israel has a human rights problem. . . . They are among the systemic users of torture and humiliation against people in the prisons.
[T]hey haven’t changed the drug, and the drug is Islamism, the Islamic state [concept], caliphism, and jihadism. Until we as Muslims condemn them as a whole, they are always going to end up feeding into radical groups.