Ethnic-Studies Scholars Hoped Their Curriculum Would Break Boundaries. Critics are Calling it Propaganda

Scholars and teachers in California hoped to write a curriculum that shattered borders, bridged differences, and challenged narrow ways of thinking about identity.

But their proposal, the Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum, has kicked off a debate among critics who say it would do almost the opposite — overlooking some identity groups and imposing a politicized doctrine on students using “fashionable academic jargon.”

[To read the entire article, please click here.]

See more on this Topic
George Washington University’s Failure to Remove MESA from Its Middle East Studies Program Shows a Continued Tolerance for the Promotion of Terrorism
One Columbia Professor Touted in a Federal Grant Application Gave a Talk Called ‘On Zionism and Jewish Supremacy’