Blinken Says U.S. Not Responsible for Ismail Haniyeh Killing; That’s Too Bad

Secretary of State Antony Blinken denied any American responsibility for the assassination of Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh. His denial is nothing about which to be proud. (Photo: Shutterstock)

Yesterday, an apparent Israeli airstrike killed Ismail Haniyeh, the Qatar-based political chief of Hamas, as he retired to a Tehran house after attending the inauguration of newly installed Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. Secretary of State Antony Blinken took to television to deny any American responsibility.

That is nothing about which to be proud. Certainly, Blinken may see such a statement as a way to de-escalate tension or at least prevent Iran and Hamas from going after American targets. The problem, however, is Iran and Hamas already target Americans. Blinken and many journalists may consider Pezeshkian a “reformer” but “Death to America” chants characterized his inauguration. As President Joe Biden, Blinken, and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan have sought to appease Iran, the Iranian government quite openly has put bounties on former government officials like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Iran point man Brian Hook and has sought to kidnap Iranian and Iranian American dissidents from American soil. Showing weakness in the face of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps outrage does not bring security; it encourages aggression.

Don’t Fear Assassinating Terrorists

Nor should assassinating terror leaders be something from which the United States shies away. The United States first designated Hamas almost three decades ago. It did so because Hamas killed not only Israelis but also Americans. It targeted children and civilians. It specialized in bombing civilian buses, markets, and restaurants. It covenant openly embraced genocide. The only difference between the Islamic State and Hamas is that the Islamic State eschewed national borders while Hamas cloaked itself in nationalism as a preliminary step toward broader Islamist rule.

For decades prior to Biden’s rise, the United States did not shy away from targeting terrorists. President George W. Bush killed Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a man responsible for dozens of American and hundreds if not thousands of Iraqi deaths. President Barack Obama (over Vice President Biden’s advice) eliminated Osama Bin Laden. He then bragged about it on television. So, too, did President Donald Trump after eliminating Iranian Quds Force Chief Qassem Soleimani.

The reluctance to strike terrorists on Iranian territory only shows the White House and State Department fail to understand the regime’s commitment to its own ideology.

Why should anyone be embarrassed about killing Haniyeh? If any explanation is due, it should be whether or not the United States had the intelligence that Israelis did. If the answer is no, then Director of Central Intelligence William Burns should explain the failure. If the answer is yes, then Blinken should explain why the United States would not act on it.

The answer is likely Biden, Blinken, and Sullivan hope for diplomacy. To target Hamas, in such thinking, would be to undermine diplomacy to release American hostages. The problem with such logic, however, is two-fold: First, it incentivizes hostage-taking to give terrorist leaders a sense of immunity. Second, Hamas’s release of all hostages should be the starting point for any negotiations, not their endpoint.

The Biden team would likely never want to embarrass Iran, from whom they still seek a miracle diplomatic breakthrough. The reluctance to strike terrorists on Iranian territory, however, only shows the White House and State Department fail to understand the regime’s commitment to its own ideology.

Blinken’s statement that the United States was not responsible for Haniyeh’s death was truly cringe-worthy, an expression of weakness that further diminishes the United States in the eyes of its enemies. The only unfortunate aspect of Haniyeh’s demise was that Israel beat the United States to it.

Michael Rubin is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, where he specializes in Middle Eastern countries, particularly Iran and Turkey. His career includes time as a Pentagon official, with field experiences in Iran, Yemen, and Iraq, as well as engagements with the Taliban prior to 9/11. Mr. Rubin has also contributed to military education, teaching U.S. Navy and Marine units about regional conflicts and terrorism. His scholarly work includes several key publications, such as “Dancing with the Devil” and “Eternal Iran.” Rubin earned his Ph.D. and M.A. in history and a B.S. in biology from Yale University.
See more from this Author
For Good Reason, the Region’s Kurds Wonder If Jerusalem Is Serious About a Kurdish Strategy
It Is Slow-Motion Genocide, Obvious to All Observers Except for Those in the White House and State Department Who Wring Their Hands
A Comprehensive Plan to Restore American Leadership, Counter Iranian Aggression, and Secure Stability in the Middle East
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.