A Unilateral Declaration of Statehood will be Costly

Pondering Palestinian Statehood

[This article was written in the context of Yasir Arafat insisting he would declare a Palestinian state on May 4, 1999, five years after a key agreement had been signed. For more background, see an article in the Economist, "Arafat's tricky descent from his UDI deadline." In the end, Arafat did not carry through with a declaration of statehood.

A Palestinian state is a foregone conclusion in a formal sense but not in its essentials. Yasir Arafat will immediately declare a state on May 4th and it will be recognized by an overwhelming number of governments around the world. But a Palestinian state differs from the Palestinian Authority only if it controls foreign and defense policies. In this sense, the Palestinian state will be formalistic, not real. Until and unless Israel accepts it, the Palestinian state will remain a shell.

When a state is declared, the results will be severely adverse for Palestinians and Israelis alike. This flagrant breach of the Oslo accords will cause economic relations to diminish further and violence to increase. The proclamation of a state will likely exacerbate the great schisms of Israeli politics, left-right and secular-religious, leading to an even more erratic Israeli policy on this issue.

The United States and Israel are more important in this case, as in so many others, than the other 180 nations. I hope they will not just refuse to recognize the Palestinian state by make it very clear to Arafat and the Palestinian Authority that a unilateral declaration will be costly to the Palestinians. Continued negotiations are the sensible alternative to a unilateral declaration of independence. The issues are difficult and the process protracted; there can be no arbitrary date for the conclusion of negotiations, for this merely invites Palestinian procrastination. For negotiations to succeed, the process must go on until its natural conclusion.

Daniel Pipes, a historian, has led the Middle East Forum since its founding in 1994. He taught at Chicago, Harvard, Pepperdine, and the U.S. Naval War College. He served in five U.S. administrations, received two presidential appointments, and testified before many congressional committees. The author of 16 books on the Middle East, Islam, and other topics, Mr. Pipes writes a column for the Washington Times and the Spectator; his work has been translated into 39 languages. DanielPipes.org contains an archive of his writings and media appearances; he tweets at @DanielPipes. He received both his A.B. and Ph.D. from Harvard. The Washington Post deems him “perhaps the most prominent U.S. scholar on radical Islam.” Al-Qaeda invited Mr. Pipes to convert and Edward Said called him an “Orientalist.”
See more from this Author
The Trump Administration Has Not Ended Foreign Aid, but Questions Whether It Serves the American Taxpayer
Trump Should Consider the Factors Involved Before Spontaneously Threatening Foreign Policy Changes
Israelis Widely Agreed in the Aftermath of the Oct. 7, 2023, Massacre That Hamas Had to Be Destroyed. Some 16 Months Later, However, Hamas Remains a Powerful Institution
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.