Iran Guards Chief Says Americans Have Started ‘Psychological War’

IRGC Commander Hossein Salami thinks the intent of recent U.S. military deployments is purely psychological.

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander Maj.-Gen. Hossein Salami attended a closed session of parliament in Tehran on Sunday, according to Iranian media reports. The newly-appointed head of the IRGC, which Washington views as a terrorist organization, said that the US is not strong enough to start a war with Iran because it has not deployed enough forces in the region.

Salami gave his assessment to parliament in a closed session. Yet Iranian media received reports about the discussion, to reassure the country that war is not imminent. The US has concentrated naval power and B-52s in the Persian Gulf in recent days, warning that any attack by Iran or its proxies would be met with a military response. Iran takes this seriously, with Tasnim News expressing concern about US President Donald Trump’s “crazy” behavior.

Briefing members of parliament about the status of Iran’s ground forces and air force, Salami said that since 2007, the IRGC has been responsible for securing the Persian Gulf and the Straits of Hormuz. That means that it would face the brunt of any attack by the US in that area and must tread carefully so as not to provoke the Americans.

Air force and ground force commanders also allegedly took part in the closed-door meeting. These included experts on air force capabilities and also the anti-ship ballistic missiles that Iran has developed. Salami looked at the psychological strategy of the US, and its naval movements. Reports noted the US buildup of forces. But Salami was confident that America does not have the forces in the region yet to begin a real war. He estimated that Washington is playing a psychological game. Parliamentarians responded that US forces in the Gulf were already scheduled to be there. For many years, America has had an aircraft carrier in the Gulf, the reports noted.

Discussion of “psychological” U.S. motives suggest the Iranian regime does not firmly grasp what may come next.

The comments by Salami were in contrast to those by Iranian President Hassan Rouhani who has termed US sanctions a form of “all-out war.” However, Salami’s views appear to dovetail with wider caution among Iranian allies. Asaib Ahl al-Haq stressed on Sunday that they would refrain from attacking US-led coalition forces in Iraq, according to local reports. Iran is carefully monitoring the US posture and is concerned that this time, Washington may not be bluffing. Its attempts to figure out the “psychological” component of Trump’s plan suggest that the mullah regime does not firmly grasp what may come next.

Seth Frantzman is The Jerusalem Post’s op-ed editor, a Writing Fellow at the Middle East Forum, and a founder of the Middle East Center for Reporting and Analysis.

A journalist and analyst concentrating on the Middle East, Seth J. Frantzman has a PhD from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and was an assistant professor at Al-Quds University. He is the Oped Editor and an analyst on Middle East Affairs at The Jerusalem Post and his work has appeared at The National Interest, The Spectator, The Hill, National Review, The Moscow Times, and Rudaw. He is a frequent guest on radio and TV programs in the region and internationally, speaking on current developments in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere. As a correspondent and researcher has covered the war on ISIS in Iraq and security in Turkey, Egypt, the Palestinian Authority, Jordan, the UAE and eastern Europe.
See more from this Author
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.