Bush@U.N.

“If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will …"

George W. Bush used this formulation five times in his speech to the United Nations Thursday, listing a long series of demands about weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, persecution, the aftermath of the 1991 Kuwait war, and its use of oil revenues.

The president then goes on: “If all these steps are taken, it will signal a new openness and accountability in Iraq.” In other words, Saddam Hussein gets another chance.

I full well know that this is intended as a ploy. It assumes that Saddam will do nothing of the sort and it counts on this then inducing the United Nations Security Council to endorse an American military campaign against the Iraqi regime.

But it is too clever by half. The U.S. government should not be offering Saddam Hussein any way out. His 30-year career shows him to be an irredeemably aggressive, thuggish totalitarian megalomaniac. No representative of the United States should ever offer him a path to respectability, just as it should not allow the United Nations to have any control over the key decisions of American foreign policy.

For these reasons, the president’s speech is a severe disappointment.

Daniel Pipes, a historian, has led the Middle East Forum since its founding in 1994 and currently serves as chairman on the board of directors. He taught at Chicago, Harvard, Pepperdine, and the U.S. Naval War College. He served in five U.S. administrations, received two presidential appointments, and testified before many congressional committees. The author of 16 books on the Middle East, Islam, and other topics, Mr. Pipes writes a column for the Washington Times and the Spectator; his work has been translated into 39 languages. DanielPipes.org contains an archive of his writings and media appearances; he tweets at @DanielPipes. He received both his A.B. and Ph.D. from Harvard. The Washington Post deems him “perhaps the most prominent U.S. scholar on radical Islam.” Al-Qaeda invited Mr. Pipes to convert and Edward Said called him an “Orientalist.”
See more from this Author
Turkey’s Erdoğan and Israel’s Netanyahu Have Both Defensive and Offensive Motives to Fight in Syria
Those Twelve Days Should Have Repercussions Long Into the Future
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.