The End of Schrödinger’s Ayatollah?

His Clerical Rank Did Not Qualify Mojtaba to Be Supreme Leader, but the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Did Not Care

Mojtaba Khamenei, center, in a file photo.

Mojtaba Khamenei, center, in a file photo.

Tasnim News Agency, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

In 1935, physicist Erwin Schrödinger sought to draw an analogy to quantum superposition by positing what became known as Schrödinger’s cat: A cat in a box, he argued, could by the interpretation of fellow scientists Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg be both alive and dead until an observer confirmed its state. He found the idea problematic, but Schrödinger’s cat nevertheless became foundational to quantum mechanics.

In the opening salvo of the Israel and U.S. attack on Iran, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei perished. The Iranian leadership convinced themselves the United States would never attack during the day and so, when day broke, Khamenei and his top aides made the fatal decision to gather.

While initial rumors suggested that [Mojtaba], too, had died, subsequent information suggested he had survived.

Khamenei’s son and de facto office director Mojtaba reportedly stepped outside before the first missiles hit. While initial rumors suggested that he, too, had died, subsequent information suggested he had survived. His clerical rank did not qualify him to assume the Islamic Republic’s leadership, but the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps did not care. They had a $100 billion business empire to protect and they knew Mojtaba would protect them. Indeed, his elevation represented a quid pro quo—leadership in exchange for protection.

Mojtaba, however, remained unseen and rumors continued to swirl, suggesting he was dead, in a coma, or undergoing medical care in Russia. Statements appeared in his name, but often after a 24-hour delay. Some within or close to the Iranian government explained his absence in practical terms: He was alive and well, they assured, but did not want to fall victim to a drone or missile. Fair enough, though even when the late Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah was a hunted man, he delivered videos of speeches so that his followers understood he was alive. The Times reported on April 6, 2026, that Mojtaba is “unconscious and receiving treatment in Qom,” citing an intelligence memo that states he is “unable to be involved in any decision-making by the regime.”

Shortly before the ceasefire, a video circulated online purporting to show Mojtaba entering Iran’s war room. Rather than putting questions about his health to rest, this raised more questions because the video appeared to be generated by artificial intelligence.

With a two-week ceasefire in place, the uncertainty surrounding Schrödinger’s ayatollah must end. Mojtaba cannot be both alive and dead: He must be one or the other.

If Mojtaba is in a coma or dead, then the regime must answer: Who is in charge?

If he is alive, he will have to address his lack of qualifications with the clerical class that resents his imposition. If he is dead, there are far more questions that impact both the Islamic Republic and war and peace. If Mojtaba is in a coma or dead, then the regime must answer: Who is in charge?

President Donald Trump may be negotiating with four-time presidential loser Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf, but if someone else is issuing statements in Mojtaba’s name and calling the shots, then they are the ones with whom Trump must negotiate. If the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is in charge, using a Mojtaba avatar, then Trump must sit back and consider why he negotiates with a regime based on a lie. Why should he implicitly accept regime legitimacy more than Iranians themselves? In such a case, he would be better off calling for a referendum and calling out the fact that Iranian leadership, over the past month, has been a phantom.

Trump sees himself as unique, but negotiating peace and being outmaneuvered by a dead man would be one precedent he should not embrace. It is time for the Islamic Republic to come clean: Mojtaba is either alive or dead; he no longer can be both.

Michael Rubin is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, where he specializes in Middle Eastern countries, particularly Iran and Turkey. His career includes time as a Pentagon official, with field experiences in Iran, Yemen, and Iraq, as well as engagements with the Taliban prior to 9/11. Mr. Rubin has also contributed to military education, teaching U.S. Navy and Marine units about regional conflicts and terrorism. His scholarly work includes several key publications, such as “Dancing with the Devil” and “Eternal Iran.” Rubin earned his Ph.D. and M.A. in history and a B.S. in biology from Yale University.
See more from this Author
Jerusalem Should Deliver the Self-Described Human Rights Activists and Their Symbolic Aid to a State with Far Greater Crises
Meeting Gulf Arab Leaders in an Airport Would Save Face for Both Sides but Break the Barrier That Has Kept Pahlavi Out
Spain’s Socialist Prime Minister Restricted Operations at the Naval Station to Express His Animosity Toward Trump and Sympathy to Iran
See more on this Topic
Courts Have Weighed in on Party Matters Before, but They Rarely Step in to Overturn the Results of an Internal Congress
Europe Treats Israeli Conduct as a Matter Requiring Correction but Treats Iranian Conduct as a Problem Requiring Management
A Difficult Question Emerges for the West: How Far Can Support for Kyiv Expand Before It Brings New Complications?