While Professor Bassam Frangieh supports Hezbollah via petition, Dean of Faculty Greg Hess and Visiting Professor Charles Calomiris don’t support the Fed’s QE2 in the pages of the Wall Street Journal via petition.
Yes, I know they aren’t equivalent. That’s the point, really. But neither is Professor Miller’s ballot testimony and Professor Hezbollah’s support of Hezbollah and that sure didn’t stop President Gann from comparing the two on the weaselly academic freedom argument. So how about it? Why is ballot policy singled out and not monetary policy?
I’m being facetious, but I’m dead serious about being against a deadly terrorist organization. (Oh, and the monetary policy stuff is bad, too.)