Related Topics

• Islam

Middle East Quarterly

• Jail for Iranian Journalists
  by Arash Sigarchi
• Iran's Revolutionary Guards - A Rogue Outfit?
  by Michael Rubin

Get Involved with the MEF

• Campus Activities
• Donations
• Employment & Internships

Articles by MEF Staff

• Obama or McCain, Iran stance won't change
  by Michael Rubin
• Boxed In: Containing a Nuclear Iran
  by Michael Rubin

MEF Wires

• "My Pentagon Years"
  by Douglas J. Feith
• What's at Stake for the West in Lebanon?
  by David Wurmser

Forthcoming Events

• Andrew McCarthy:
  Willful Blindness: Memoir of the Jihad
  

Press Releases

• Irfan Yusuf Apologizes Again to Daniel Pipes
  October 1
• Irfan Yusuf Apologizes to Daniel Pipes
  September 17

Most Viewed Articles

1. Assessing English Translations of the Qur'an
2. Iran's Revolutionary Guards - A Rogue Outfit?
3. Beheading in the Name of Islam
4. The Middle East's Tribal DNA
5. Ahmadinejad and the Mahdi

Most Mailed Articles

1. Obama or McCain, Iran stance won't change
2. Iran's Revolutionary Guards - A Rogue Outfit?
3. The Middle East's Tribal DNA
4. Does Islam Justify Honor Killings?
5. Sharia Law: Coming to a Western Nation Near You?

WINTER 2004 • VOLUME XI: NUMBER 1

Subscribe   |    Archive   |    Submit Manuscript   |    Board of Editors   |    Contact Editor   |

Tolerance and Coercion in Islam
Interfaith Relations in the Muslim Tradition

by Yohanan Friedman
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 233 pp. $60.

Reviewed by Daniel Pipes

Middle East Quarterly
Winter 2004

Print

Send

RSS

What does Islam say about non-Muslims? The vast literature on this subject tends to wobble unsteadily on a narrow base of evidence—namely the Qur'an itself. Or as Friedman, professor of Islamic studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, delicately puts it, "some of the more substantial works on our topic are based exclusively on the few relevant Qur'anic verses and, surprisingly enough, have no recourse to the enormous amount of material in hadith, tafsir, and fiqh." The preference to focus on the Qur'an rather than the million or so hadiths (sayings and actions attributed to Muhammad) is certainly understandable, but for a true understanding of Muslim jurisprudence and ethos, the latter needs to be taken into account.

In a tour de force, Friedman reviews the hadith literature on a series of topics concerning pre-modern Muslim attitudes toward non-Muslims, including equality before the law, religious compulsion, apostasy, and interfaith marriages. The power of his analysis lies in the distinctions he finds between eras and madhhabs (schools of law). For example, he shows that whereas Muslims early on granted non-Muslims equal protection from murder, with time, only one of the four Sunni madhhabs held to this position. More broadly, he argues that this development over time signifies that "the idea of Islamic exaltedness gained the upper hand as the decisive factor in the determination of the law."

This theme of Islamic supremicism has key importance; in the words of one hadith, "Islam is exalted and nothing is exalted above it." With the most minor of exceptions, Friedman observes, Muslims throughout the pre-modern period "faced the other religions from the position of a ruling power, and enjoyed in relation to them a position of unmistakable superiority." To a great extent, this also defined their attitudes toward tolerance and coercion.

Related Topics: Islam

To receive articles regularly by email, join the MEF News mailing list.
To receive the full, printed version of the Middle East Quarterly, please see details about an affordable subscription.

Related Items

• Other items from the Winter 2004 Middle East Quarterly
• Other items by Daniel Pipes