Middle East Forum

Other MEF Websites:   Campus Watch   |   Daniel Pipes   |   Islamist Watch

Middle East Forum

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Assessing English Translations of the Qur'an
  2. Review of The Jewel of Medina
  3. Beheading in the Name of Islam
  4. Prince Charles of Arabia
  5. The Islamist Role in the 2008 Canadian Elections

 

  1. Ending America's Dependence on Middle East Oil
  2. Review of The Jewel of Medina
  3. Assessing English Translations of the Qur'an
  4. Jihad on Trial
  5. Obama's Middle East Studies Mentors

JUNE 1996 • VOLUME III: NUMBER 2

Subscribe   |    Archive   |    Submit Manuscript   |    Board of Editors   |    Contact Editor   |   

Firearms of the Islamic World

by Robert Elgood
London: I. B. Tauris, 1995. 240 pp.

Reviewed by Nick Beckwith

Middle East Quarterly
June 1996

Print Send RSS

Elgood's lavishly illustrated volume of historic guns in the Taraq Rajab Museum in Kuwait (whose saving from Iraqi troops is described in Invasion Kuwait: An Englishwoman's Tale, reviewed in MEQ, Dec. 1994) has an unusually useful text for a coffee-table book. The author surveys Middle Eastern reluctance to accept firearms and shows that those quickest to embrace this new technology (for example, the Ottomans) were more successful in war -- though they suffered taunts from their defeated opponents about relying on weapons suitable only for women and Christians. By the 1660s, however, European armies adopted the flintlock, against which Turkish arquebus were hopelessly outclassed, leading to the Ottomans' expulsion from Europe.

The Industrial Revolution intensified this technological gap as Middle Eastern gunsmiths tried in vain, using handicraft methods, to produce lockwork of European quality. Eventually, Muslims bought their weapons from Europe, whose manufacturers offered guns decorated to Middle Eastern taste (so elaborate, it constitutes a minor art form) as standard catalog items. But Middle Easterners could not effectively use these arms. Mamluk warriors were better armed than Napoleon's forces in 1798 but were cut to ribbons by the "steady discipline and accurate volley fire of the French troops." 28 Tactics and training, not the latest weaponry, proved to be the key to victory.

And so it remains today. In 1991, Saddam Husayn's large army and advanced weaponry could not save him from ignominious defeat. His ground forces relied on tactics already obsolete in 1918, and Iraqi modifications of Russian Scud missiles proved so ham-fisted they could not even be counted on to survive reentry intact, let alone hit a specific target. Then as now, advanced weaponry has dubious utility unless accompanied by an advanced technical infrastructure and sound tactics.

To receive articles regularly by email, join the MEF News mailing list.
To receive the full, printed version of the Middle East Quarterly, please see details about an affordable subscription.

Related Items

©1994-2008 The Middle East Forum • 1500 Walnut St. • Suite 1050 • Philadelphia, PA 19102 • Tel: 215-546-5406 • Fax: 215-546-5409 • E-mail: info@meforum.org